Skip to Content
Main content

ACHIEVEMENT FIRST ENDEAVOR CHARTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

130

25%

LEVEL 2

238

46%

LEVEL 3

122

23%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

61

11%

LEVEL 2

198

37%

LEVEL 3

204

38%

LEVEL 4

70

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

56

20%

LEVEL 2

133

48%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

115

39%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

74

31%

LEVEL 2

105

44%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

96

40%

LEVEL 3

89

37%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

140
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

117

25%

LEVEL 2

210

45%

LEVEL 3

112

24%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

246
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

56

12%

LEVEL 2

177

37%

LEVEL 3

186

39%

LEVEL 4

60

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

17

36%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

79

19%

LEVEL 2

200

48%

LEVEL 3

112

27%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

158

36%

LEVEL 3

187

42%

LEVEL 4

69

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

51

51%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

34

37%

LEVEL 2

40

43%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

23

27%

LEVEL 2

29

34%

LEVEL 3

25

29%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

45

41%

LEVEL 4

23

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

107

25%

LEVEL 2

209

48%

LEVEL 3

97

22%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

52

12%

LEVEL 2

164

39%

LEVEL 3

159

38%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.