KINGS COLLEGIATE CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

55

18%

LEVEL 2

161

52%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

135

42%

LEVEL 3

101

31%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

73

47%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

65

43%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

88

57%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

47

27%

LEVEL 2

70

40%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

90
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

157

53%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

119
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

131

42%

LEVEL 3

96

31%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

145

53%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

115

42%

LEVEL 3

98

35%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

18

50%

LEVEL 2

16

44%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

25

52%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

32

50%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

10

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

28

47%

LEVEL 3

19

32%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

47

19%

LEVEL 2

129

53%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

60

23%

LEVEL 2

107

40%

LEVEL 3

82

31%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.