Skip to Content
Main content

LEADERSHIP PREP OCEAN HILL CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

120

37%

LEVEL 3

122

37%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

115

27%

LEVEL 3

175

42%

LEVEL 4

97

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

72

42%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

151
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

92

42%

LEVEL 4

59

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

60

39%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

83

41%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

134
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

105

37%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

232
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

148

42%

LEVEL 4

84

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

19

41%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

117

40%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

94

25%

LEVEL 3

169

45%

LEVEL 4

94

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

14

39%

LEVEL 2

16

44%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

18

38%

LEVEL 2

21

44%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

25

45%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

30

43%

LEVEL 4

19

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

97

36%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

223
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

99

28%

LEVEL 3

145

41%

LEVEL 4

78

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.