Skip to Content
Main content

DEMOCRACY PREP HARLEM CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

106

32%

LEVEL 2

178

54%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

148

51%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

43

24%

LEVEL 2

106

60%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

78

55%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

63

42%

LEVEL 2

72

48%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

42

28%

LEVEL 2

70

47%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

84

37%

LEVEL 2

112

50%

LEVEL 3

23

10%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

50

26%

LEVEL 2

94

49%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

22

23%

LEVEL 2

59

63%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

16

18%

LEVEL 2

51

56%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

68

27%

LEVEL 2

148

58%

LEVEL 3

33

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

41

17%

LEVEL 2

126

53%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

38

52%

LEVEL 2

30

41%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

25

47%

LEVEL 2

22

42%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

44
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

94

31%

LEVEL 2

170

55%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

143

53%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

15

75%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

37

31%

LEVEL 2

60

50%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

34

54%

LEVEL 3

19

30%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

69

33%

LEVEL 2

118

57%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

58

25%

LEVEL 2

114

50%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.