Skip to Content
Main content

KIPP NYC WASHINGTON HEIGHTS ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

97

25%

LEVEL 2

185

48%

LEVEL 3

84

22%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

85

15%

LEVEL 2

200

35%

LEVEL 3

221

39%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

106

50%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

120

40%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

50

29%

LEVEL 2

79

45%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

53

20%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

101

38%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

13

24%

LEVEL 2

32

59%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

14

18%

LEVEL 2

33

43%

LEVEL 3

21

28%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

91
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

82

25%

LEVEL 2

152

47%

LEVEL 3

72

22%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

248
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

70

15%

LEVEL 2

162

34%

LEVEL 3

197

41%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

67

20%

LEVEL 2

166

50%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

39

8%

LEVEL 2

162

35%

LEVEL 3

210

45%

LEVEL 4

55

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

30

55%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

46

46%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

103
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

69

20%

LEVEL 2

169

50%

LEVEL 3

83

24%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

277
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

57

11%

LEVEL 2

179

35%

LEVEL 3

218

42%

LEVEL 4

59

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

28

62%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

28

54%

LEVEL 2

21

40%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

20

53%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

24

48%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

90

26%

LEVEL 2

165

47%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

250
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

81

16%

LEVEL 2

184

36%

LEVEL 3

197

38%

LEVEL 4

53

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.