KINGS COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53,015
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 135,305

LEVEL 1

34,658

26%

LEVEL 2

47,632

35%

LEVEL 3

35,658

26%

LEVEL 4

17,357

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57,733
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 136,607

LEVEL 1

33,017

24%

LEVEL 2

45,857

34%

LEVEL 3

37,107

27%

LEVEL 4

20,626

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30,051
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 66,897

LEVEL 1

13,469

20%

LEVEL 2

23,377

35%

LEVEL 3

19,455

29%

LEVEL 4

10,596

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32,536
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 67,432

LEVEL 1

12,930

19%

LEVEL 2

21,966

33%

LEVEL 3

19,926

30%

LEVEL 4

12,610

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22,964
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 68,408

LEVEL 1

21,189

31%

LEVEL 2

24,255

35%

LEVEL 3

16,203

24%

LEVEL 4

6,761

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25,197
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 69,175

LEVEL 1

20,087

29%

LEVEL 2

23,891

35%

LEVEL 3

17,181

25%

LEVEL 4

8,016

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

592
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 959

LEVEL 1

130

14%

LEVEL 2

237

25%

LEVEL 3

321

33%

LEVEL 4

271

28%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

788
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,228

LEVEL 1

146

12%

LEVEL 2

294

24%

LEVEL 3

420

34%

LEVEL 4

368

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

331
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 983

LEVEL 1

304

31%

LEVEL 2

348

35%

LEVEL 3

232

24%

LEVEL 4

99

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

391
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,043

LEVEL 1

283

27%

LEVEL 2

369

35%

LEVEL 3

261

25%

LEVEL 4

130

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11,591
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,300

LEVEL 1

3,591

17%

LEVEL 2

6,118

29%

LEVEL 3

6,810

32%

LEVEL 4

4,781

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12,602
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,118

LEVEL 1

3,630

16%

LEVEL 2

5,886

27%

LEVEL 3

6,991

32%

LEVEL 4

5,611

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12,948
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,777

LEVEL 1

3,101

14%

LEVEL 2

5,728

26%

LEVEL 3

7,425

34%

LEVEL 4

5,523

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13,540
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,324

LEVEL 1

3,129

14%

LEVEL 2

5,655

25%

LEVEL 3

7,333

33%

LEVEL 4

6,207

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16,280
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 51,860

LEVEL 1

15,108

29%

LEVEL 2

20,472

39%

LEVEL 3

12,275

24%

LEVEL 4

4,005

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17,983
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 51,059

LEVEL 1

13,842

27%

LEVEL 2

19,234

38%

LEVEL 3

12,992

25%

LEVEL 4

4,991

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11,273
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38,426

LEVEL 1

12,424

32%

LEVEL 2

14,729

38%

LEVEL 3

8,595

22%

LEVEL 4

2,678

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12,429
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 38,835

LEVEL 1

11,987

31%

LEVEL 2

14,419

37%

LEVEL 3

9,110

23%

LEVEL 4

3,319

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50,260
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 108,241

LEVEL 1

18,605

17%

LEVEL 2

39,376

36%

LEVEL 3

33,353

31%

LEVEL 4

16,907

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54,575
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 109,932

LEVEL 1

18,085

16%

LEVEL 2

37,272

34%

LEVEL 3

34,493

31%

LEVEL 4

20,082

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2,755
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 27,064

LEVEL 1

16,053

59%

LEVEL 2

8,256

31%

LEVEL 3

2,305

9%

LEVEL 4

450

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3,158
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,675

LEVEL 1

14,932

56%

LEVEL 2

8,585

32%

LEVEL 3

2,614

10%

LEVEL 4

544

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

52,275
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 121,997

LEVEL 1

25,720

21%

LEVEL 2

44,002

36%

LEVEL 3

34,972

29%

LEVEL 4

17,303

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

56,782
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 122,107

LEVEL 1

23,756

19%

LEVEL 2

41,569

34%

LEVEL 3

36,224

30%

LEVEL 4

20,558

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

740
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,308

LEVEL 1

8,938

67%

LEVEL 2

3,630

27%

LEVEL 3

686

5%

LEVEL 4

54

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

951
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,500

LEVEL 1

9,261

64%

LEVEL 2

4,288

30%

LEVEL 3

883

6%

LEVEL 4

68

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19,731
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 36,481

LEVEL 1

6,024

17%

LEVEL 2

10,726

29%

LEVEL 3

11,763

32%

LEVEL 4

7,968

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21,262
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 36,630

LEVEL 1

5,407

15%

LEVEL 2

9,961

27%

LEVEL 3

11,976

33%

LEVEL 4

9,286

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33,284
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 98,824

LEVEL 1

28,634

29%

LEVEL 2

36,906

37%

LEVEL 3

23,895

24%

LEVEL 4

9,389

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36,471
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 99,977

LEVEL 1

27,610

28%

LEVEL 2

35,896

36%

LEVEL 3

25,131

25%

LEVEL 4

11,340

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.