Skip to Content
Main content

RICHMOND COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,639
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,874

LEVEL 1

5,914

22%

LEVEL 2

9,321

35%

LEVEL 3

7,823

29%

LEVEL 4

3,816

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,329
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,843

LEVEL 1

5,591

21%

LEVEL 2

8,923

33%

LEVEL 3

7,811

29%

LEVEL 4

4,518

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,584
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,076

LEVEL 1

2,131

16%

LEVEL 2

4,361

33%

LEVEL 3

4,228

32%

LEVEL 4

2,356

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,904
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,053

LEVEL 1

1,996

15%

LEVEL 2

4,153

32%

LEVEL 3

4,158

32%

LEVEL 4

2,746

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,055
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,798

LEVEL 1

3,783

27%

LEVEL 2

4,960

36%

LEVEL 3

3,595

26%

LEVEL 4

1,460

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,425
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,790

LEVEL 1

3,595

26%

LEVEL 2

4,770

35%

LEVEL 3

3,653

26%

LEVEL 4

1,772

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

119
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

160
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

70

21%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

61

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

46
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

27

23%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

49
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

43

35%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,374
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,123

LEVEL 1

186

9%

LEVEL 2

563

27%

LEVEL 3

805

38%

LEVEL 4

569

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,477
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,261

LEVEL 1

224

10%

LEVEL 2

560

25%

LEVEL 3

769

34%

LEVEL 4

708

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7,002
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,145

LEVEL 1

1,851

14%

LEVEL 2

4,292

33%

LEVEL 3

4,532

34%

LEVEL 4

2,470

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7,126
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,711

LEVEL 1

1,623

13%

LEVEL 2

3,962

31%

LEVEL 3

4,366

34%

LEVEL 4

2,760

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

884
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,725

LEVEL 1

1,418

38%

LEVEL 2

1,423

38%

LEVEL 3

673

18%

LEVEL 4

211

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

999
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,683

LEVEL 1

1,379

37%

LEVEL 2

1,305

35%

LEVEL 3

738

20%

LEVEL 4

261

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,214
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,494

LEVEL 1

2,370

32%

LEVEL 2

2,910

39%

LEVEL 3

1,704

23%

LEVEL 4

510

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,518
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,734

LEVEL 1

2,252

29%

LEVEL 2

2,964

38%

LEVEL 3

1,805

23%

LEVEL 4

713

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,774
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,559

LEVEL 1

2,033

10%

LEVEL 2

6,752

35%

LEVEL 3

7,076

36%

LEVEL 4

3,698

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,415
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,673

LEVEL 1

1,964

10%

LEVEL 2

6,294

32%

LEVEL 3

7,036

36%

LEVEL 4

4,379

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

865
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,315

LEVEL 1

3,881

53%

LEVEL 2

2,569

35%

LEVEL 3

747

10%

LEVEL 4

118

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

914
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,170

LEVEL 1

3,627

51%

LEVEL 2

2,629

37%

LEVEL 3

775

11%

LEVEL 4

139

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11,595
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,613

LEVEL 1

5,047

20%

LEVEL 2

8,971

35%

LEVEL 3

7,781

30%

LEVEL 4

3,814

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12,242
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,431

LEVEL 1

4,691

18%

LEVEL 2

8,498

33%

LEVEL 3

7,728

30%

LEVEL 4

4,514

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

44
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,261

LEVEL 1

867

69%

LEVEL 2

350

28%

LEVEL 3

42

3%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

87
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,412

LEVEL 1

900

64%

LEVEL 2

425

30%

LEVEL 3

83

6%

LEVEL 4

4

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,673
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,492

LEVEL 1

1,396

12%

LEVEL 2

3,423

30%

LEVEL 3

4,172

36%

LEVEL 4

2,501

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,845
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,382

LEVEL 1

1,266

11%

LEVEL 2

3,271

29%

LEVEL 3

3,955

35%

LEVEL 4

2,890

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,966
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,382

LEVEL 1

4,518

29%

LEVEL 2

5,898

38%

LEVEL 3

3,651

24%

LEVEL 4

1,315

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,484
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,461

LEVEL 1

4,325

28%

LEVEL 2

5,652

37%

LEVEL 3

3,856

25%

LEVEL 4

1,628

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.