LE ROY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

108

23%

LEVEL 2

180

38%

LEVEL 3

145

30%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

118

24%

LEVEL 2

164

33%

LEVEL 3

158

32%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

88

39%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

77

34%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

66

27%

LEVEL 2

92

37%

LEVEL 3

75

30%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

78

29%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

181
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

99

22%

LEVEL 2

171

38%

LEVEL 3

140

31%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

201
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

106

23%

LEVEL 2

154

33%

LEVEL 3

154

33%

LEVEL 4

47

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

81

18%

LEVEL 2

171

39%

LEVEL 3

144

33%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

84

19%

LEVEL 2

153

34%

LEVEL 3

158

35%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

27

71%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

34

76%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

109

36%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

61

19%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

120

38%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

59

35%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

57

33%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.