HONEOYE FALLS-LIMA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

398
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 686

LEVEL 1

111

16%

LEVEL 2

177

26%

LEVEL 3

244

36%

LEVEL 4

154

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

419
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 778

LEVEL 1

107

14%

LEVEL 2

252

32%

LEVEL 3

250

32%

LEVEL 4

169

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

204
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

85

26%

LEVEL 3

112

35%

LEVEL 4

92

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

214
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

100

28%

LEVEL 3

126

35%

LEVEL 4

88

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

194
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

79

22%

LEVEL 2

92

25%

LEVEL 3

132

36%

LEVEL 4

62

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

205
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

66

16%

LEVEL 2

152

36%

LEVEL 3

124

29%

LEVEL 4

81

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

9

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

366
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 625

LEVEL 1

97

16%

LEVEL 2

162

26%

LEVEL 3

227

36%

LEVEL 4

139

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

385
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 708

LEVEL 1

95

13%

LEVEL 2

228

32%

LEVEL 3

233

33%

LEVEL 4

152

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

394
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

57

9%

LEVEL 2

169

27%

LEVEL 3

241

39%

LEVEL 4

153

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

415
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 708

LEVEL 1

65

9%

LEVEL 2

228

32%

LEVEL 3

248

35%

LEVEL 4

167

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

54

82%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

42

60%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

366
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

71

12%

LEVEL 2

144

25%

LEVEL 3

219

38%

LEVEL 4

147

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

375
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

70

11%

LEVEL 2

199

31%

LEVEL 3

215

33%

LEVEL 4

160

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

40

38%

LEVEL 2

33

31%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

37

28%

LEVEL 2

53

40%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.