Skip to Content
Main content

QUAKER RIDGE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

38

17%

LEVEL 3

113

51%

LEVEL 4

68

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

36

17%

LEVEL 3

105

49%

LEVEL 4

69

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

16

15%

LEVEL 3

52

48%

LEVEL 4

40

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

44

43%

LEVEL 4

43

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

61

54%

LEVEL 4

28

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

61

54%

LEVEL 4

26

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

15

48%

LEVEL 4

12

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

14

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

85

52%

LEVEL 4

46

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

24

15%

LEVEL 3

84

53%

LEVEL 4

48

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

30

15%

LEVEL 3

108

53%

LEVEL 4

67

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

30

15%

LEVEL 3

100

50%

LEVEL 4

68

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.