Skip to Content
Main content

SOMERS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

77

14%

LEVEL 2

193

36%

LEVEL 3

233

43%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

79

15%

LEVEL 2

187

36%

LEVEL 3

201

39%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

119

44%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

95

38%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

114

43%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

106

39%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

15

54%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

227
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

71

15%

LEVEL 2

176

37%

LEVEL 3

199

42%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

215
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

72

16%

LEVEL 2

171

37%

LEVEL 3

172

38%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

15

54%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

16

48%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

39

8%

LEVEL 2

172

36%

LEVEL 3

228

48%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

160

36%

LEVEL 3

191

43%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

38

59%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

36

49%

LEVEL 2

27

37%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

250
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

72

15%

LEVEL 2

171

35%

LEVEL 3

218

44%

LEVEL 4

32

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

237
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

65

14%

LEVEL 2

167

36%

LEVEL 3

192

41%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

22

51%

LEVEL 3

15

35%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.