PELHAM MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

376
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

165

28%

LEVEL 3

216

37%

LEVEL 4

160

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

365
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

40

7%

LEVEL 2

154

28%

LEVEL 3

242

43%

LEVEL 4

123

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

209
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

67

23%

LEVEL 3

111

38%

LEVEL 4

98

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

212
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

61

21%

LEVEL 3

135

46%

LEVEL 4

77

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

98

34%

LEVEL 3

105

36%

LEVEL 4

62

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

153
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

107

40%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

32
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

14

34%

LEVEL 4

18

44%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

32
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

20

53%

LEVEL 4

12

32%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

14

38%

LEVEL 4

15

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

20

57%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

265
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

108

28%

LEVEL 3

152

39%

LEVEL 4

113

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

257
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

110

28%

LEVEL 3

170

44%

LEVEL 4

87

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

33

39%

LEVEL 3

30

36%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

9

12%

LEVEL 2

26

35%

LEVEL 3

27

36%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

371
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

144

27%

LEVEL 3

212

40%

LEVEL 4

159

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

359
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

129

25%

LEVEL 3

238

47%

LEVEL 4

121

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

23

47%

LEVEL 2

21

43%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

25

52%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

360
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

23

4%

LEVEL 2

150

28%

LEVEL 3

204

38%

LEVEL 4

156

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

348
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

139

27%

LEVEL 3

228

44%

LEVEL 4

120

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

15

33%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.