Skip to Content
Main content

SAYVILLE UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

122

39%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

134

39%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

67

45%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

79

51%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

39

21%

LEVEL 2

88

46%

LEVEL 3

55

29%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

11

48%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

99

40%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

105

39%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

105

37%

LEVEL 3

117

41%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

131

41%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

19

66%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

112

39%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

113

37%

LEVEL 3

125

41%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

16

39%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.