Skip to Content
Main content

NORWOOD-NORFOLK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

141

36%

LEVEL 2

157

40%

LEVEL 3

74

19%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

145

36%

LEVEL 2

156

38%

LEVEL 3

80

20%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

60

31%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

41

21%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

63

30%

LEVEL 2

89

42%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

81

41%

LEVEL 2

79

40%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

82

42%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

133

35%

LEVEL 2

151

40%

LEVEL 3

74

20%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

142

36%

LEVEL 2

151

38%

LEVEL 3

78

20%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

92

28%

LEVEL 2

150

45%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

94

28%

LEVEL 2

142

42%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

49

84%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

51

77%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

73

45%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

36

22%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

112

49%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

109

46%

LEVEL 2

95

40%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.