MASSENA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 979

LEVEL 1

309

32%

LEVEL 2

388

40%

LEVEL 3

202

21%

LEVEL 4

80

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

363
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,107

LEVEL 1

308

28%

LEVEL 2

436

39%

LEVEL 3

298

27%

LEVEL 4

65

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

179
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

131

26%

LEVEL 2

185

37%

LEVEL 3

126

25%

LEVEL 4

53

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

223
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

130

23%

LEVEL 2

210

37%

LEVEL 3

177

31%

LEVEL 4

46

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

178

37%

LEVEL 2

203

42%

LEVEL 3

76

16%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

178

33%

LEVEL 2

226

42%

LEVEL 3

121

22%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

15
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

26

39%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

14

21%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

19
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

28

31%

LEVEL 2

44

48%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

254
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 866

LEVEL 1

274

32%

LEVEL 2

338

39%

LEVEL 3

179

21%

LEVEL 4

75

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

328
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 961

LEVEL 1

264

27%

LEVEL 2

369

38%

LEVEL 3

270

28%

LEVEL 4

58

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

13

59%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 807

LEVEL 1

178

22%

LEVEL 2

357

44%

LEVEL 3

194

24%

LEVEL 4

78

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

348
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 896

LEVEL 1

180

20%

LEVEL 2

368

41%

LEVEL 3

285

32%

LEVEL 4

63

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

131

76%

LEVEL 2

31

18%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

128

61%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

72

18%

LEVEL 2

163

42%

LEVEL 3

100

26%

LEVEL 4

57

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

189
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

71

17%

LEVEL 2

160

38%

LEVEL 3

144

34%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

237

40%

LEVEL 2

225

38%

LEVEL 3

102

17%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

174
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 687

LEVEL 1

237

34%

LEVEL 2

276

40%

LEVEL 3

154

22%

LEVEL 4

20

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.