Skip to Content
Main content

SKANEATELES CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

60

11%

LEVEL 2

159

29%

LEVEL 3

223

40%

LEVEL 4

115

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

50

11%

LEVEL 2

132

28%

LEVEL 3

180

38%

LEVEL 4

106

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

169
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

106

43%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

77

36%

LEVEL 4

61

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

169
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

103

33%

LEVEL 3

117

38%

LEVEL 4

52

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

103

40%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

9

69%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

322
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

60

11%

LEVEL 2

151

28%

LEVEL 3

211

40%

LEVEL 4

111

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

277
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

129

28%

LEVEL 3

174

38%

LEVEL 4

103

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

336
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

153

30%

LEVEL 3

221

43%

LEVEL 4

115

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

120

28%

LEVEL 3

180

41%

LEVEL 4

105

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

31

79%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

20

61%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

286
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

49

11%

LEVEL 2

128

28%

LEVEL 3

180

39%

LEVEL 4

106

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

313
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

145

29%

LEVEL 3

207

41%

LEVEL 4

106

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

266
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

113

27%

LEVEL 3

171

41%

LEVEL 4

95

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

16

29%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

16

29%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

19

38%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.