Skip to Content
Main content

CLINTON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

70

16%

LEVEL 2

135

31%

LEVEL 3

147

34%

LEVEL 4

84

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

65

15%

LEVEL 2

129

29%

LEVEL 3

145

33%

LEVEL 4

107

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

74

33%

LEVEL 4

56

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

76

33%

LEVEL 4

73

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

213
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

66

17%

LEVEL 2

121

30%

LEVEL 3

136

34%

LEVEL 4

77

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

232
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

59

14%

LEVEL 2

118

29%

LEVEL 3

131

32%

LEVEL 4

101

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

125

32%

LEVEL 3

144

37%

LEVEL 4

84

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

34

9%

LEVEL 2

112

29%

LEVEL 3

140

36%

LEVEL 4

106

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

29

69%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

31

57%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

99

29%

LEVEL 3

125

37%

LEVEL 4

74

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

214
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

118

35%

LEVEL 4

96

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

31

31%

LEVEL 2

36

36%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

28

26%

LEVEL 2

41

38%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.