HARRY F ABATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

150

46%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

149

44%

LEVEL 2

100

29%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

70

43%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

74

41%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

80

48%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

75

47%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

26

50%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

22

45%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

35

31%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

32

28%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

39

33%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

23

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

72

58%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

70

54%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

13

57%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

105

38%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

108

37%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

45

96%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

41

87%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

15

25%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

21

34%

LEVEL 4

12

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

20

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

135

51%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

145

50%

LEVEL 2

86

30%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.