Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #24 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,530
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,598

LEVEL 1

6,530

25%

LEVEL 2

9,538

36%

LEVEL 3

7,108

27%

LEVEL 4

3,422

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,987
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,934

LEVEL 1

6,735

25%

LEVEL 2

9,212

34%

LEVEL 3

7,172

27%

LEVEL 4

3,815

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,842
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,851

LEVEL 1

2,483

19%

LEVEL 2

4,526

35%

LEVEL 3

3,793

30%

LEVEL 4

2,049

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,063
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,078

LEVEL 1

2,624

20%

LEVEL 2

4,391

34%

LEVEL 3

3,757

29%

LEVEL 4

2,306

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,688
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,747

LEVEL 1

4,047

29%

LEVEL 2

5,012

36%

LEVEL 3

3,315

24%

LEVEL 4

1,373

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,924
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,856

LEVEL 1

4,111

30%

LEVEL 2

4,821

35%

LEVEL 3

3,415

25%

LEVEL 4

1,509

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

11

23%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

28
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

23

38%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

46
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

21

23%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

56
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

17

16%

LEVEL 2

33

31%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

24

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3,367
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,556

LEVEL 1

637

11%

LEVEL 2

1,552

28%

LEVEL 3

1,963

35%

LEVEL 4

1,404

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3,537
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,657

LEVEL 1

672

12%

LEVEL 2

1,448

26%

LEVEL 3

1,924

34%

LEVEL 4

1,613

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,081
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,764

LEVEL 1

539

14%

LEVEL 2

1,144

30%

LEVEL 3

1,254

33%

LEVEL 4

827

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,131
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,733

LEVEL 1

519

14%

LEVEL 2

1,083

29%

LEVEL 3

1,271

34%

LEVEL 4

860

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

140
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

138

30%

LEVEL 2

180

39%

LEVEL 3

115

25%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

144
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

131

29%

LEVEL 2

176

39%

LEVEL 3

101

22%

LEVEL 4

43

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4,872
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,680

LEVEL 1

5,185

31%

LEVEL 2

6,623

40%

LEVEL 3

3,736

22%

LEVEL 4

1,136

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5,091
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,926

LEVEL 1

5,386

32%

LEVEL 2

6,449

38%

LEVEL 3

3,825

23%

LEVEL 4

1,266

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,139
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,576

LEVEL 1

3,476

16%

LEVEL 2

7,961

37%

LEVEL 3

6,764

31%

LEVEL 4

3,375

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,545
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,801

LEVEL 1

3,671

17%

LEVEL 2

7,585

35%

LEVEL 3

6,786

31%

LEVEL 4

3,759

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

391
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,022

LEVEL 1

3,054

61%

LEVEL 2

1,577

31%

LEVEL 3

344

7%

LEVEL 4

47

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

442
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,133

LEVEL 1

3,064

60%

LEVEL 2

1,627

32%

LEVEL 3

386

8%

LEVEL 4

56

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10,327
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,995

LEVEL 1

3,471

16%

LEVEL 2

8,197

37%

LEVEL 3

6,923

31%

LEVEL 4

3,404

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10,691
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,658

LEVEL 1

3,316

15%

LEVEL 2

7,651

35%

LEVEL 3

6,886

32%

LEVEL 4

3,805

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

203
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,603

LEVEL 1

3,059

66%

LEVEL 2

1,341

29%

LEVEL 3

185

4%

LEVEL 4

18

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

296
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,276

LEVEL 1

3,419

65%

LEVEL 2

1,561

30%

LEVEL 3

286

5%

LEVEL 4

10

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,697
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,342

LEVEL 1

1,382

19%

LEVEL 2

2,263

31%

LEVEL 3

2,259

31%

LEVEL 4

1,438

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,020
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,908

LEVEL 1

1,492

19%

LEVEL 2

2,396

30%

LEVEL 3

2,404

30%

LEVEL 4

1,616

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,833
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,256

LEVEL 1

5,148

27%

LEVEL 2

7,275

38%

LEVEL 3

4,849

25%

LEVEL 4

1,984

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,967
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,026

LEVEL 1

5,243

28%

LEVEL 2

6,816

36%

LEVEL 3

4,768

25%

LEVEL 4

2,199

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.