Skip to Content
Main content

MEDGAR EVERS COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

48

17%

LEVEL 3

118

41%

LEVEL 4

117

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

44

15%

LEVEL 3

102

34%

LEVEL 4

153

51%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

61

38%

LEVEL 4

74

46%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

143
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

20

12%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

90

55%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

57

46%

LEVEL 4

43

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

49

36%

LEVEL 4

63

46%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

8

62%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

14
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

206
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

42

17%

LEVEL 3

107

43%

LEVEL 4

99

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

222
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

39

15%

LEVEL 3

86

33%

LEVEL 4

136

52%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

21

21%

LEVEL 3

42

42%

LEVEL 4

38

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

25

32%

LEVEL 4

46

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

27

15%

LEVEL 3

76

41%

LEVEL 4

79

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

184
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

37

17%

LEVEL 3

77

35%

LEVEL 4

107

48%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.