GEORGE A JACKSON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

29

13%

LEVEL 3

83

37%

LEVEL 4

98

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

25

11%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

120

55%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

39

40%

LEVEL 4

45

46%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

75

71%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

17

14%

LEVEL 3

44

35%

LEVEL 4

53

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

46

41%

LEVEL 4

45

40%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

127
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

17

11%

LEVEL 3

52

35%

LEVEL 4

75

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

133
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

13

8%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

90

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

29

47%

LEVEL 4

20

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

19

39%

LEVEL 4

24

49%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

11%

LEVEL 3

77

39%

LEVEL 4

97

49%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

117

59%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

180
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

120

58%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

25

12%

LEVEL 3

79

39%

LEVEL 4

91

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

24

12%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

108

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

7

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

12

75%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.