Skip to Content
Main content

CHITTENANGO MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

116

25%

LEVEL 2

172

38%

LEVEL 3

106

23%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

93

21%

LEVEL 2

200

44%

LEVEL 3

117

26%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

95

41%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

72

33%

LEVEL 2

79

37%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

62

28%

LEVEL 2

105

48%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

108

25%

LEVEL 2

159

37%

LEVEL 3

101

24%

LEVEL 4

60

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

85

20%

LEVEL 2

187

45%

LEVEL 3

111

26%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

162

41%

LEVEL 3

105

27%

LEVEL 4

63

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

180

47%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

40

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

51

81%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

44

65%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

110

38%

LEVEL 3

83

28%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

133

46%

LEVEL 3

86

30%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

68

41%

LEVEL 2

62

37%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

61

37%

LEVEL 2

67

41%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.