GENERAL BROWN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

140

23%

LEVEL 2

265

43%

LEVEL 3

163

27%

LEVEL 4

43

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 625

LEVEL 1

140

22%

LEVEL 2

227

36%

LEVEL 3

181

29%

LEVEL 4

77

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

128

44%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

98

34%

LEVEL 3

110

38%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

93

29%

LEVEL 2

137

43%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

99

30%

LEVEL 2

129

39%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

133

23%

LEVEL 2

250

43%

LEVEL 3

151

26%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

245
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

133

23%

LEVEL 2

209

36%

LEVEL 3

171

29%

LEVEL 4

74

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

67

13%

LEVEL 2

238

47%

LEVEL 3

155

31%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

84

16%

LEVEL 2

187

36%

LEVEL 3

174

34%

LEVEL 4

74

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

73

67%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

56

53%

LEVEL 2

40

38%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

48

14%

LEVEL 2

152

43%

LEVEL 3

117

33%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

188
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

131

36%

LEVEL 4

57

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

92

36%

LEVEL 2

113

44%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

88

33%

LEVEL 2

105

40%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.