HERKIMER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

152

41%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

171

41%

LEVEL 2

168

40%

LEVEL 3

58

14%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

72

39%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

79

36%

LEVEL 2

90

41%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

80

42%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

92

47%

LEVEL 2

78

40%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

131

40%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

145

40%

LEVEL 2

147

41%

LEVEL 3

51

14%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

11

55%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

97

31%

LEVEL 2

131

42%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

107

31%

LEVEL 2

160

47%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

55

89%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

64

89%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

46

28%

LEVEL 2

79

47%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

101

50%

LEVEL 2

71

35%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

125

50%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.