MAYFIELD CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

105

32%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

110

30%

LEVEL 2

140

39%

LEVEL 3

77

21%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

75

42%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

62

39%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

69

38%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

105
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

99

31%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

104

30%

LEVEL 2

131

38%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

74

26%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

78

24%

LEVEL 2

132

41%

LEVEL 3

75

23%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

31

78%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

32

76%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

63

37%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

68

43%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

72

39%

LEVEL 2

75

41%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.