Skip to Content
Main content

DR LYDIA T WRIGHT SCH OF EXCELLENCE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

231

65%

LEVEL 2

92

26%

LEVEL 3

30

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

193

53%

LEVEL 2

125

34%

LEVEL 3

38

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

103

58%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

103

51%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

128

71%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

90

56%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

209

66%

LEVEL 2

80

25%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

167

52%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

163

57%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

132

46%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

68

93%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

61

78%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

40

62%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

23

43%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

191

65%

LEVEL 2

76

26%

LEVEL 3

23

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

170

55%

LEVEL 2

105

34%

LEVEL 3

29

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.