Skip to Content
Main content

LINDEN AVENUE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

57

19%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

81

27%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

95

38%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

55

38%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

31

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

48

37%

LEVEL 3

47

36%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

39

26%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

27

22%

LEVEL 2

47

39%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

48

19%

LEVEL 2

93

36%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

102

39%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

88

40%

LEVEL 3

78

35%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

24

77%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

22

71%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

132
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

54

19%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

51

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

87

38%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

50

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

73

36%

LEVEL 4

33

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

29

46%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

20

40%

LEVEL 2

17

34%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.