Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTHWESTERN CSD AT JAMESTOWN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

145

27%

LEVEL 2

178

33%

LEVEL 3

142

26%

LEVEL 4

79

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

113

20%

LEVEL 2

196

34%

LEVEL 3

177

31%

LEVEL 4

83

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

48

19%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

65

21%

LEVEL 2

113

36%

LEVEL 3

99

31%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

129

26%

LEVEL 2

163

33%

LEVEL 3

125

26%

LEVEL 4

73

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

234
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

101

20%

LEVEL 2

176

34%

LEVEL 3

157

31%

LEVEL 4

77

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

85

18%

LEVEL 2

170

36%

LEVEL 3

140

30%

LEVEL 4

78

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

73

14%

LEVEL 2

177

35%

LEVEL 3

173

34%

LEVEL 4

83

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

60

85%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

40

63%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

110

32%

LEVEL 3

113

32%

LEVEL 4

69

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

113

32%

LEVEL 3

129

37%

LEVEL 4

68

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

88

45%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

71

33%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.