WEEDSPORT CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

72

29%

LEVEL 2

101

41%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

62

25%

LEVEL 2

120

47%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

32

26%

LEVEL 2

50

40%

LEVEL 3

36

29%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

66

49%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

40

33%

LEVEL 2

51

41%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

38

32%

LEVEL 2

54

46%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

69

30%

LEVEL 2

91

40%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

59

26%

LEVEL 2

105

46%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

96

45%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

104

47%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

28

80%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

16

52%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

78

45%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

44

23%

LEVEL 2

88

47%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

35

49%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

18

28%

LEVEL 2

32

49%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.