Skip to Content
Main content

BOLIVAR-RICHBURG CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

111

40%

LEVEL 2

113

41%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

107

36%

LEVEL 2

116

39%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

43

34%

LEVEL 2

52

41%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

45

33%

LEVEL 2

52

38%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

68

44%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

62

39%

LEVEL 2

64

40%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

109

40%

LEVEL 2

108

40%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

104

36%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

82

33%

LEVEL 2

109

44%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

75

29%

LEVEL 2

109

42%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

29

85%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

32

80%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

25

25%

LEVEL 2

49

49%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

29

26%

LEVEL 2

47

42%

LEVEL 3

29

26%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

86

48%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

78

42%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.