Skip to Content
Main content

CHENANGO VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

75

25%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

123

40%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

36

27%

LEVEL 4

25

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

51

42%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

26

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

69

42%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

70

25%

LEVEL 2

108

39%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

110

40%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

47

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

102

43%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

80

32%

LEVEL 4

47

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

45

74%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

23

41%

LEVEL 2

26

46%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

77

40%

LEVEL 3

63

33%

LEVEL 4

40

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

44

42%

LEVEL 2

42

40%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

34

31%

LEVEL 2

46

41%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.