BRONX CHARTER SCH-EXCELLENCE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

322
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

157

31%

LEVEL 3

223

45%

LEVEL 4

99

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

332
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

35

6%

LEVEL 2

172

32%

LEVEL 3

226

42%

LEVEL 4

106

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

109

43%

LEVEL 4

56

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

173
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

111

42%

LEVEL 4

62

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

114

46%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

159
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

91

33%

LEVEL 3

115

42%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

145
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

110

49%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

133
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

94

41%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

62

37%

LEVEL 3

66

39%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

109
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

83

45%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

132

30%

LEVEL 3

208

47%

LEVEL 4

95

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

321
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

146

30%

LEVEL 3

217

45%

LEVEL 4

104

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

9

17%

LEVEL 2

25

47%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

17

31%

LEVEL 2

26

48%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

319
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

14

3%

LEVEL 2

147

31%

LEVEL 3

220

46%

LEVEL 4

99

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

327
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

33

6%

LEVEL 2

159

31%

LEVEL 3

221

43%

LEVEL 4

106

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

13

65%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

31

23%

LEVEL 3

66

50%

LEVEL 4

29

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

55

41%

LEVEL 4

32

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

126

34%

LEVEL 3

157

43%

LEVEL 4

70

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

245
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

132

33%

LEVEL 3

171

42%

LEVEL 4

74

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.