ALL CITY LEADERSHIP SECONDARY SCH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

26

15%

LEVEL 3

79

44%

LEVEL 4

74

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

16

9%

LEVEL 3

77

43%

LEVEL 4

86

48%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

49

45%

LEVEL 4

49

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

6%

LEVEL 3

39

36%

LEVEL 4

64

59%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

30

43%

LEVEL 4

25

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

38

54%

LEVEL 4

22

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

7

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

11

65%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

8

47%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

118
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

18

13%

LEVEL 3

62

46%

LEVEL 4

56

41%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

128
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

9%

LEVEL 3

61

44%

LEVEL 4

67

48%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

9

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

14

48%

LEVEL 4

13

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

22

14%

LEVEL 3

70

45%

LEVEL 4

65

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

14

9%

LEVEL 3

63

42%

LEVEL 4

73

49%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.