ACHIEVEMENT FIRST CROWN HEIGHTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

65

12%

LEVEL 2

223

42%

LEVEL 3

195

37%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

72

13%

LEVEL 2

196

35%

LEVEL 3

193

35%

LEVEL 4

92

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

109

39%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

106

39%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

112

44%

LEVEL 3

86

34%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

107

38%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

238
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

62

12%

LEVEL 2

215

42%

LEVEL 3

189

37%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

277
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

71

13%

LEVEL 2

185

35%

LEVEL 3

187

35%

LEVEL 4

90

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

9

64%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

37

8%

LEVEL 2

195

42%

LEVEL 3

182

39%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

41

9%

LEVEL 2

158

34%

LEVEL 3

177

38%

LEVEL 4

89

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

28

40%

LEVEL 2

28

40%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

31

35%

LEVEL 2

38

43%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

60

39%

LEVEL 3

57

38%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

43

35%

LEVEL 3

34

28%

LEVEL 4

33

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

51

13%

LEVEL 2

163

43%

LEVEL 3

138

36%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

218
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

60

14%

LEVEL 2

153

35%

LEVEL 3

159

37%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.