ACHIEVEMENT FIRST E NY CHARTER SCH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

176

40%

LEVEL 3

167

38%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

125

30%

LEVEL 3

181

43%

LEVEL 4

88

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

151
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

114

46%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

161
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

106

48%

LEVEL 4

55

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

96

49%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

75

38%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

182
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

145

40%

LEVEL 3

134

37%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

215
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

102

30%

LEVEL 3

140

42%

LEVEL 4

75

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

31

44%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

37

49%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

152

39%

LEVEL 3

163

42%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

98

27%

LEVEL 3

170

46%

LEVEL 4

88

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

22

44%

LEVEL 2

24

48%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

15

28%

LEVEL 2

27

51%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

28

44%

LEVEL 3

26

41%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

29

48%

LEVEL 4

20

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

189
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

148

39%

LEVEL 3

141

37%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

220
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

115

32%

LEVEL 3

152

42%

LEVEL 4

68

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.