RIVERTON STREET CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

82

17%

LEVEL 2

211

43%

LEVEL 3

141

29%

LEVEL 4

52

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

85

16%

LEVEL 2

207

40%

LEVEL 3

175

34%

LEVEL 4

53

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

107

43%

LEVEL 3

75

30%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

139
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

98

36%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

104

44%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

109

44%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

184
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

73

16%

LEVEL 2

191

43%

LEVEL 3

132

29%

LEVEL 4

52

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

212
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

74

16%

LEVEL 2

189

40%

LEVEL 3

163

34%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

18

58%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

17

44%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

184

44%

LEVEL 3

136

33%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

48

11%

LEVEL 2

176

40%

LEVEL 3

169

38%

LEVEL 4

52

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

35

51%

LEVEL 2

27

40%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

37

49%

LEVEL 2

31

41%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

9

15%

LEVEL 2

29

48%

LEVEL 3

14

23%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

165
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

136

39%

LEVEL 3

126

36%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

73

17%

LEVEL 2

182

43%

LEVEL 3

127

30%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

39

23%

LEVEL 2

71

41%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.