Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-BED STUY 1 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

8

4%

LEVEL 3

96

47%

LEVEL 4

98

48%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

19

6%

LEVEL 3

156

51%

LEVEL 4

127

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

53

50%

LEVEL 4

51

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

148
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

3

2%

LEVEL 3

76

50%

LEVEL 4

72

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

6%

LEVEL 3

43

44%

LEVEL 4

47

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

16

11%

LEVEL 3

80

53%

LEVEL 4

55

36%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

149
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

75

48%

LEVEL 4

74

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

210
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

121

54%

LEVEL 4

89

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

14

39%

LEVEL 4

21

58%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

31

48%

LEVEL 4

29

45%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

2%

LEVEL 3

81

46%

LEVEL 4

93

53%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

5%

LEVEL 3

128

49%

LEVEL 4

120

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

15

58%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

28

64%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

39

43%

LEVEL 4

47

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

14

9%

LEVEL 3

74

49%

LEVEL 4

63

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

57

50%

LEVEL 4

51

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

5

3%

LEVEL 3

82

54%

LEVEL 4

64

42%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.