Skip to Content
Main content

CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,288
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,156

LEVEL 1

2,404

34%

LEVEL 2

2,464

34%

LEVEL 3

1,630

23%

LEVEL 4

658

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,805
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,314

LEVEL 1

2,178

30%

LEVEL 2

2,331

32%

LEVEL 3

1,909

26%

LEVEL 4

896

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,325
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,452

LEVEL 1

960

28%

LEVEL 2

1,167

34%

LEVEL 3

907

26%

LEVEL 4

418

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,567
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,477

LEVEL 1

812

23%

LEVEL 2

1,098

32%

LEVEL 3

1,024

29%

LEVEL 4

543

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

963
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,704

LEVEL 1

1,444

39%

LEVEL 2

1,297

35%

LEVEL 3

723

20%

LEVEL 4

240

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,238
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,837

LEVEL 1

1,366

36%

LEVEL 2

1,233

32%

LEVEL 3

885

23%

LEVEL 4

353

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

90
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

149

41%

LEVEL 2

126

35%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

116
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

144

37%

LEVEL 2

131

34%

LEVEL 3

89

23%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

32

41%

LEVEL 2

32

41%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

30

50%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

12

30%

LEVEL 4

12

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

16

38%

LEVEL 4

16

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,968
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,465

LEVEL 1

1,559

29%

LEVEL 2

1,938

35%

LEVEL 3

1,386

25%

LEVEL 4

582

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,406
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,544

LEVEL 1

1,362

25%

LEVEL 2

1,776

32%

LEVEL 3

1,597

29%

LEVEL 4

809

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

84

56%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

67

46%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

172
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,058

LEVEL 1

573

54%

LEVEL 2

313

30%

LEVEL 3

135

13%

LEVEL 4

37

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

208
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,131

LEVEL 1

571

50%

LEVEL 2

352

31%

LEVEL 3

174

15%

LEVEL 4

34

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,252
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,192

LEVEL 1

1,672

27%

LEVEL 2

2,268

37%

LEVEL 3

1,596

26%

LEVEL 4

656

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,729
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,276

LEVEL 1

1,486

24%

LEVEL 2

2,061

33%

LEVEL 3

1,842

29%

LEVEL 4

887

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 964

LEVEL 1

732

76%

LEVEL 2

196

20%

LEVEL 3

34

4%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

76
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,038

LEVEL 1

692

67%

LEVEL 2

270

26%

LEVEL 3

67

6%

LEVEL 4

9

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,286
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,916

LEVEL 1

2,208

32%

LEVEL 2

2,422

35%

LEVEL 3

1,628

24%

LEVEL 4

658

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,795
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,061

LEVEL 1

1,980

28%

LEVEL 2

2,286

32%

LEVEL 3

1,900

27%

LEVEL 4

895

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

196

82%

LEVEL 2

42

18%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

198

78%

LEVEL 2

45

18%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,380
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,001

LEVEL 1

588

20%

LEVEL 2

1,033

34%

LEVEL 3

906

30%

LEVEL 4

474

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,604
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,976

LEVEL 1

484

16%

LEVEL 2

888

30%

LEVEL 3

992

33%

LEVEL 4

612

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

908
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,155

LEVEL 1

1,816

44%

LEVEL 2

1,431

34%

LEVEL 3

724

17%

LEVEL 4

184

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,201
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,338

LEVEL 1

1,694

39%

LEVEL 2

1,443

33%

LEVEL 3

917

21%

LEVEL 4

284

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,283
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,127

LEVEL 1

2,389

34%

LEVEL 2

2,455

34%

LEVEL 3

1,626

23%

LEVEL 4

657

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,800
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,286

LEVEL 1

2,163

30%

LEVEL 2

2,323

32%

LEVEL 3

1,905

26%

LEVEL 4

895

12%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

15

52%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

5
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.