Skip to Content
Main content

JEFFERSON COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,401
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,875

LEVEL 1

1,687

25%

LEVEL 2

2,787

41%

LEVEL 3

1,760

26%

LEVEL 4

641

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,896
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,966

LEVEL 1

1,591

23%

LEVEL 2

2,479

36%

LEVEL 3

2,127

31%

LEVEL 4

769

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,426
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,435

LEVEL 1

637

19%

LEVEL 2

1,372

40%

LEVEL 3

1,011

29%

LEVEL 4

415

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,663
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,449

LEVEL 1

611

18%

LEVEL 2

1,175

34%

LEVEL 3

1,166

34%

LEVEL 4

497

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

975
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,440

LEVEL 1

1,050

31%

LEVEL 2

1,415

41%

LEVEL 3

749

22%

LEVEL 4

226

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,233
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,517

LEVEL 1

980

28%

LEVEL 2

1,304

37%

LEVEL 3

961

27%

LEVEL 4

272

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

134
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

90

26%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

107

30%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

162
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

79

21%

LEVEL 2

135

36%

LEVEL 3

125

33%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

59
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

25

21%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

44

36%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

60
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

18

17%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

39

36%

LEVEL 4

21

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,893
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,426

LEVEL 1

1,315

24%

LEVEL 2

2,218

41%

LEVEL 3

1,371

25%

LEVEL 4

522

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,319
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,515

LEVEL 1

1,264

23%

LEVEL 2

1,932

35%

LEVEL 3

1,693

31%

LEVEL 4

626

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

118
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

109

27%

LEVEL 2

172

43%

LEVEL 3

90

23%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

130
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

93

24%

LEVEL 2

161

42%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

189
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

138

25%

LEVEL 2

221

40%

LEVEL 3

142

26%

LEVEL 4

47

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

216
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

129

23%

LEVEL 2

214

38%

LEVEL 3

165

30%

LEVEL 4

51

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,341
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,741

LEVEL 1

1,010

18%

LEVEL 2

2,390

42%

LEVEL 3

1,708

30%

LEVEL 4

633

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,785
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,841

LEVEL 1

956

16%

LEVEL 2

2,100

36%

LEVEL 3

2,027

35%

LEVEL 4

758

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

60
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,134

LEVEL 1

677

60%

LEVEL 2

397

35%

LEVEL 3

52

5%

LEVEL 4

8

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

111
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,125

LEVEL 1

635

56%

LEVEL 2

379

34%

LEVEL 3

100

9%

LEVEL 4

11

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,388
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,790

LEVEL 1

1,645

24%

LEVEL 2

2,757

41%

LEVEL 3

1,749

26%

LEVEL 4

639

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,885
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,903

LEVEL 1

1,563

23%

LEVEL 2

2,455

36%

LEVEL 3

2,116

31%

LEVEL 4

769

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

42

49%

LEVEL 2

30

35%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

28

44%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,528
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,185

LEVEL 1

460

14%

LEVEL 2

1,197

38%

LEVEL 3

1,068

34%

LEVEL 4

460

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,657
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,040

LEVEL 1

422

14%

LEVEL 2

961

32%

LEVEL 3

1,149

38%

LEVEL 4

508

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

873
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,690

LEVEL 1

1,227

33%

LEVEL 2

1,590

43%

LEVEL 3

692

19%

LEVEL 4

181

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,239
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,926

LEVEL 1

1,169

30%

LEVEL 2

1,518

39%

LEVEL 3

978

25%

LEVEL 4

261

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,399
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,859

LEVEL 1

1,679

24%

LEVEL 2

2,781

41%

LEVEL 3

1,758

26%

LEVEL 4

641

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,888
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,946

LEVEL 1

1,583

23%

LEVEL 2

2,475

36%

LEVEL 3

2,122

31%

LEVEL 4

766

11%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.