GORHAM-MIDDLESEX CSD (MARCUS WHITMAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

127

31%

LEVEL 2

157

38%

LEVEL 3

97

24%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

109

27%

LEVEL 2

147

37%

LEVEL 3

109

27%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

52

27%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

84

40%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

75

34%

LEVEL 2

91

41%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

61

32%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

123

31%

LEVEL 2

153

38%

LEVEL 3

96

24%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

106

28%

LEVEL 2

140

36%

LEVEL 3

106

28%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

74

22%

LEVEL 2

139

41%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

62

19%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

53

70%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

47

61%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

74

38%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

65

37%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

70

35%

LEVEL 2

81

40%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.