RICHARD J BAILEY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

111

29%

LEVEL 2

147

39%

LEVEL 3

80

21%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

115

29%

LEVEL 2

141

35%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

68

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

54

27%

LEVEL 2

76

38%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

54

25%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

57

31%

LEVEL 2

71

39%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

61

33%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

22

40%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

12

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

10

18%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

17

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

44
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

50

34%

LEVEL 2

53

36%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

51

33%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

49

33%

LEVEL 2

61

41%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

49

31%

LEVEL 2

50

32%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

126

38%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

68

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

52

71%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

123
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

89

25%

LEVEL 2

139

40%

LEVEL 3

80

23%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

146
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

94

25%

LEVEL 2

129

35%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

68

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

22

73%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

21

62%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

37

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

86

34%

LEVEL 2

98

39%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.