Skip to Content
Main content

KINGS PARK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

66

12%

LEVEL 2

189

34%

LEVEL 3

198

35%

LEVEL 4

106

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

372
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

125

23%

LEVEL 3

228

42%

LEVEL 4

144

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

82

29%

LEVEL 3

108

39%

LEVEL 4

73

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

204
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

55

20%

LEVEL 3

103

38%

LEVEL 4

101

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

107

38%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

168
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

125

47%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

10

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

256
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

53

11%

LEVEL 2

162

34%

LEVEL 3

168

36%

LEVEL 4

88

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

314
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

37

8%

LEVEL 2

102

23%

LEVEL 3

198

44%

LEVEL 4

116

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

21

39%

LEVEL 4

13

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

160

34%

LEVEL 3

191

40%

LEVEL 4

105

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

357
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

98

21%

LEVEL 3

214

45%

LEVEL 4

143

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

45

55%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

21

33%

LEVEL 2

27

43%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

372
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

124

23%

LEVEL 3

228

43%

LEVEL 4

144

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

276
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

162

33%

LEVEL 3

179

37%

LEVEL 4

97

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

337
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

101

21%

LEVEL 3

203

43%

LEVEL 4

134

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

19

26%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

25

38%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.