BRASHER FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

136

35%

LEVEL 2

141

36%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

122

30%

LEVEL 2

130

32%

LEVEL 3

107

27%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

63

32%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

87

43%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

83

40%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

127

35%

LEVEL 2

124

34%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

113

30%

LEVEL 2

124

33%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

90

28%

LEVEL 2

127

39%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

83

24%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

46

73%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

39

70%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

56

34%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

63

37%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

102

45%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

90

39%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.