Skip to Content
Main content

HOWARD L GOFF SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

425
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 718

LEVEL 1

81

11%

LEVEL 2

212

30%

LEVEL 3

232

32%

LEVEL 4

193

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

468
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

89

12%

LEVEL 2

179

24%

LEVEL 3

240

33%

LEVEL 4

228

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

228
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

85

24%

LEVEL 3

121

35%

LEVEL 4

107

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

240
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

80

22%

LEVEL 3

105

29%

LEVEL 4

135

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

197
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

47

13%

LEVEL 2

127

34%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

86

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

228
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

48

13%

LEVEL 2

99

26%

LEVEL 3

135

36%

LEVEL 4

93

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

12

32%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

14

44%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

13

31%

LEVEL 4

19

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

20

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

347
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

60

10%

LEVEL 2

172

30%

LEVEL 3

197

34%

LEVEL 4

150

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

386
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

68

11%

LEVEL 2

149

25%

LEVEL 3

202

33%

LEVEL 4

184

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

10

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

19

45%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

413
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

35

6%

LEVEL 2

182

29%

LEVEL 3

221

35%

LEVEL 4

192

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

448
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

39

6%

LEVEL 2

148

23%

LEVEL 3

223

35%

LEVEL 4

225

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

46

52%

LEVEL 2

30

34%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

50

50%

LEVEL 2

31

31%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

376
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

39

7%

LEVEL 2

152

27%

LEVEL 3

199

35%

LEVEL 4

177

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

390
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

46

8%

LEVEL 2

124

22%

LEVEL 3

189

34%

LEVEL 4

201

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

42

28%

LEVEL 2

60

40%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

43

24%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.