ANNA S KUHL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

157

41%

LEVEL 2

127

33%

LEVEL 3

78

20%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

145

34%

LEVEL 2

134

31%

LEVEL 3

112

26%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

72

35%

LEVEL 2

71

35%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

69

31%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

85

48%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

76

37%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

88

38%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

72

29%

LEVEL 2

81

33%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

29

57%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

23

46%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

29

39%

LEVEL 2

26

35%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

34

37%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

118

36%

LEVEL 2

119

36%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

107

29%

LEVEL 2

121

33%

LEVEL 3

103

28%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

39

76%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

38

63%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

145
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

140

34%

LEVEL 2

132

32%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

32

26%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

27

21%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

43

34%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

125

48%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

118

39%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.