Skip to Content
Main content

EDWARD SMITH K-8 SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

172

42%

LEVEL 2

111

27%

LEVEL 3

77

19%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

219

49%

LEVEL 2

100

22%

LEVEL 3

82

18%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

76

37%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

96

43%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

96

48%

LEVEL 2

44

22%

LEVEL 3

40

20%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

123

55%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

14

52%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

34

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

41

26%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

33

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

105

59%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

142

67%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

108

33%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

143

41%

LEVEL 2

88

25%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

64

79%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

76

82%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

123
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

136

37%

LEVEL 2

108

29%

LEVEL 3

77

21%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

125
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

169

44%

LEVEL 2

94

24%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

36

92%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

50

88%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

46

26%

LEVEL 3

57

32%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

48

37%

LEVEL 4

33

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

133

59%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

201

64%

LEVEL 2

70

22%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.