Skip to Content
Main content

PS 54 CHARLES W LENG GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

56

15%

LEVEL 2

100

28%

LEVEL 3

143

39%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

47

13%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

142

40%

LEVEL 4

74

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

74

42%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

43

23%

LEVEL 3

74

39%

LEVEL 4

48

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

38

20%

LEVEL 2

53

28%

LEVEL 3

69

37%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

68

40%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

75
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

20

20%

LEVEL 3

54

53%

LEVEL 4

21

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

75
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

51

47%

LEVEL 4

24

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

44

37%

LEVEL 4

24

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

52

44%

LEVEL 4

28

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

8

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

26

24%

LEVEL 2

33

31%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

22

23%

LEVEL 2

35

36%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

69

25%

LEVEL 3

126

46%

LEVEL 4

61

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

59

23%

LEVEL 3

119

46%

LEVEL 4

71

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

41

45%

LEVEL 2

31

34%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

35

37%

LEVEL 2

34

36%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

206
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

45

13%

LEVEL 2

93

27%

LEVEL 3

142

41%

LEVEL 4

64

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

214
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

84

25%

LEVEL 3

140

42%

LEVEL 4

74

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

64

42%

LEVEL 4

40

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

64

46%

LEVEL 4

32

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

43

20%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

79

37%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

78

36%

LEVEL 4

42

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.