Skip to Content
Main content

PS 196 GRAND CENTRAL PARKWAY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

336
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

65

16%

LEVEL 3

146

35%

LEVEL 4

190

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

349
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

24

6%

LEVEL 3

157

41%

LEVEL 4

192

51%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

182
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

80

38%

LEVEL 4

102

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

197
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

7

3%

LEVEL 3

82

40%

LEVEL 4

115

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

88

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

17

10%

LEVEL 3

75

44%

LEVEL 4

77

45%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

13

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

15

50%

LEVEL 4

14

47%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

141
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

22

13%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

92

55%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

136
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

93

64%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

61

41%

LEVEL 4

62

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

10

7%

LEVEL 3

72

48%

LEVEL 4

66

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

20

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

23

55%

LEVEL 4

14

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

323
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

43

12%

LEVEL 3

138

37%

LEVEL 4

185

50%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

333
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

20

6%

LEVEL 3

143

40%

LEVEL 4

190

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

22

45%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

14

61%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

334
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

61

15%

LEVEL 3

145

35%

LEVEL 4

189

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

280
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

39

12%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

165

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

275
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

18

6%

LEVEL 3

115

39%

LEVEL 4

160

54%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

31

34%

LEVEL 4

25

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

42

51%

LEVEL 4

32

39%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.