Skip to Content
Main content

PS 50 TALFOURD LAWN ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

75

22%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

119

34%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

70

20%

LEVEL 2

98

29%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

71

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

61

39%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

50

30%

LEVEL 4

37

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

51

29%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

34

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

23
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

10

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

18
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

8

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

55
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

38

45%

LEVEL 4

17

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

59
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

26

31%

LEVEL 4

33

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

19

27%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

35
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

24

31%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

26

33%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

42

29%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

32

23%

LEVEL 2

49

36%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

115

42%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

98

35%

LEVEL 4

68

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

44

62%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

38

58%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

164
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

54

18%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

115

38%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

166
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

57

19%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

97

32%

LEVEL 4

69

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

21

48%

LEVEL 2

19

43%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

18

45%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

9

53%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

7

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

71

21%

LEVEL 2

104

31%

LEVEL 3

110

33%

LEVEL 4

46

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

69

21%

LEVEL 2

95

29%

LEVEL 3

95

29%

LEVEL 4

64

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.