Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 187 HUDSON CLIFFS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

65

13%

LEVEL 2

166

34%

LEVEL 3

160

33%

LEVEL 4

91

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

313
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

35

7%

LEVEL 2

151

30%

LEVEL 3

179

36%

LEVEL 4

134

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

82

34%

LEVEL 4

58

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

180
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

97

37%

LEVEL 4

83

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

78

33%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

82

34%

LEVEL 4

51

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

11

65%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

9

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

8

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

60

38%

LEVEL 4

60

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

28

17%

LEVEL 3

65

38%

LEVEL 4

74

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

102
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

57

20%

LEVEL 2

121

43%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

135
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

96

35%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

126

31%

LEVEL 3

145

36%

LEVEL 4

90

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

116

28%

LEVEL 3

158

38%

LEVEL 4

128

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

24

30%

LEVEL 2

40

50%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

22

26%

LEVEL 2

35

42%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

249
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

51

11%

LEVEL 2

156

34%

LEVEL 3

159

35%

LEVEL 4

90

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

312
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

142

30%

LEVEL 3

178

37%

LEVEL 4

134

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

14

54%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

92

37%

LEVEL 4

72

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

56

21%

LEVEL 3

95

36%

LEVEL 4

103

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

53

23%

LEVEL 2

94

40%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

95

40%

LEVEL 3

84

36%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.